This page is still in preparation - be patient, coming soon.
The sensational 2009, unabridged,
'tell-all' report including Red Slider's
infamous April rant to the Cal Expo Board of
Directors (unedited and unexpurgated)
right there
on page 51, where the whole world can read it.
download here ↓
Yup! In Stock - We've got the text of that
other 'infamous' note, the Cal-Expo/NBA
"Letter of Understanding" (L.O.U)
Download it here ↓
"Cal-Expo L.O.U."
Looks more like an I.O.U. to us.
What do you think?
Oh, and get a load of Clause
3.B, while you're at it. Sure looks
like a gag rule to us.
CEAV: Hey, what's with the muzzle
you folks put on yourselves in
that "Letter of Understanding?
Bartosik: "That's a common business
practice. Businesses do it all the
time."
CEAV: May I remind you, Mr. Bartosik,
that Cal-Expo is not a private business.
You are a public official, charged with
doing the public's business and serving
the public interest.
Third-party agreements to
not discuss
matters of interest and concern to the public are
not ok. They are conflicts of interest.
And, while you're there, in L.O.U.-land,
you might as well look at Clause 3.C, as well.
That's the one where the parties appear to
be saying they will respect the Bagley-Keene
Act (Calfornia's 'Sunshine' Law).
Now consider the fact that
the Cal Expo Committee (the "Real Estate
Committee"), charged with the principle
responsibility for reviewing and developing
the Cal-Expo/NBA scheme, is made up of only
two members. Oh, did I forget to mention that the
Bagley-Keene Act only applies to public
bodies of
more than two members ? Cal-Expo
doesn't mention it, either.
And we can only wonder
why the other eleven members of Cal-Expo's Board
didn't think the committee that was virtually
deciding Cal-Expo's future was important enough
for them to sit on? Yes, we wondered about
that.
fOOTER not installed at this time