FREE!
(while supplies last.)

"Cal-Expo - An Alternate Vision"

The sensational 2009, unabridged, 'tell-all' report including Red Slider's infamous April rant to the Cal Expo Board of Directors (unedited and unexpurgated) right there on page 51, where the whole world can read it.

download here ↓ 

The CEAV Proposal

Yup! In Stock - We've got the text of that other 'infamous' note, the Cal-Expo/NBA "Letter of Understanding" (L.O.U)

Download it here ↓ 

"Cal-Expo L.O.U."

Looks more like an I.O.U. to us. What do you think?

Oh, and get a load of Clause 3.B, while you're at it. Sure looks like a gag rule to us.

CEAV: Hey, what's with the muzzle you folks put on yourselves in that "Letter of Understanding?

Bartosik: "That's a common business practice. Businesses do it all the time."

CEAV: May I remind you, Mr. Bartosik, that Cal-Expo is not a private business. You are a public official, charged with doing the public's business and serving the public interest. Third-party agreements to not discuss matters of interest and concern to the public are not ok. They are conflicts of interest.

And, while you're there, in L.O.U.-land, you might as well look at Clause 3.C, as well. That's the one where the parties appear to be saying they will respect the Bagley-Keene Act (Calfornia's 'Sunshine' Law).

Now consider the fact that the Cal Expo Committee (the "Real Estate Committee"), charged with the principle responsibility for reviewing and developing the Cal-Expo/NBA scheme, is made up of only two members. Oh, did I forget to mention that the Bagley-Keene Act only applies to public bodies of more than two members ? Cal-Expo doesn't mention it, either.

And we can only wonder why the other eleven members of Cal-Expo's Board didn't think the committee that was virtually deciding Cal-Expo's future was important enough for them to sit on? Yes, we wondered about that.